Showing posts with label gender. Show all posts
Showing posts with label gender. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 31, 2010

"The conventional view serves to protect us from the painful job of thinking." - John Kenneth Galbraith


Three broadcast networks rejected an ad for using the dirty word "vagina." So Kotex had the ad reshot, using the second grade euphemism "down there." Two out of three networks still considered that to be inappropriate. (Unfortunately, they're not telling which networks made this ludicrous decision, or you can bet they'd be getting emails from Change.org readers.)

“It’s very funny because the whole spot is about censorship,” Merrie Harris, global business director at JWT, which created the T.V. spot, told the New York Times. “The whole category has been very euphemistic, or paternalistic even, and we’re saying, enough with the euphemisms, and get over it. Tampon is not a dirty word, and neither is vagina.” Au contraire, say squeamish networks that think lady-products are icky.

Change.org | Terms "Vagina" and "Down There" Banned from T.V. Ads
Image by Tobin Yelland

Tuesday, March 02, 2010

"Chastity - the most unnatural of all the sexual perversions." - Aldous Huxley


BRISTOL, Va. – Nineteen-year-old Keshia Canter handed three burgers, fries and milkshakes to a car-load of Tuesday afternoon customers at the Hi-Lo Burger’s drive-though window. A lady sitting in the backseat leaned forward, between the two men in front, and handed her a leaflet: “Women & Girls” it said across the top.
“Even though nothing is showing, you’re being ungodly,” Canter recalled the woman telling her. “You make men want to be sinful.”
Canter was wearing boots pulled up over jeans, a pink zebra-print shirt with a black jacket zipped up over it. She has blond hair, dark eye make-up and a little red lip ring. “I just asked if she needed any salt, pepper or ketchup,” Canter said. “I mean, how do I respond to that?”
Minutes later, Canter’s mother, Pam Yates, who owns the restaurant, returned from the bank. Canter handed her “Women & Girls” and Yates started reading.
“You may have been given this leaflet because of the way you are dressed,” it begins. “Have you thought about standing before the true and living God to be judged?”
It continues with one essential theme: The sins of men are, in part, the fault of women, specifically women in tight-fitting clothing. Yates was annoyed. Then she got to a section on page two:
“Scripture tells us that when a man looks on a woman to lust for her he has already committed adultery in his heart. If you are dressed in a way that tempts a men to do this secret (or not so secret) sin, you are a participant in the sin,” the leaflet states. “By the way, some rape victims would not have been raped if they had dressed properly. So can we really say they were innocent victims?”
The hand-out is signed “anonymous.”

TriCities Local News | Blame the victim: Religious leaflet claims ‘ungodly’ dressed women provoke rape

Monday, October 12, 2009

"Few people have the imagination for reality." - Goethe



Senator Al Franken tears the living shit out of a Halliburton/KBR lawyer over imprisonment after gang-rape coverup.